Assessment
Plan
In
planning assessment in a cooperative classroom, the teacher has to check
the targets to assess, check the procedures to use, and match the targets
with the procedures. Three types of assessment can be used: diagnostic
assessment that refers to student’s actual level of knowledge and
skills, formative assessment that monitors students’ progress toward
learning goals, and summative assessment that provides data to judge the
final level of students’ learning (Johnson, Johnson, & Holubec 1998).
|
What
is assessed
|
Procedures
used to assess
|
|
____
Academic learning
|
____
Goal setting conferences
|
|
____
Reasoning process/strategies
|
____
Standardized tests
|
|
____
Skills & competencies
|
____
Teacher-made tests
|
|
____
Attitudes
|
____
Written compositions
|
|
____
Work habits
|
____
Oral presentations
|
|
|
____
Projects
|
|
|
____
Portfolios
|
|
|
____
Observations
|
|
|
____
Questionnaires
|
|
|
____
Interviews
|
|
|
____
Learning logs & journals
|
|
|
____
Student management teams
|
Assessment
Definitions
Exercise:
Alone or with a pa rtner match the definition with the concept it
represents. This is an exercise that would enhance the understanding of
the following concepts: instruction, learning, rubric, assessment,
criteria, and evaluation.
Concept
|
Definition
|
|
___
1. Instruction
|
a.
Change within a student that is brought about by instruction.
|
|
___
2. Learning
|
b.
Judging the merit, value, or desirability of a measured
performance.
|
|
___
3. Rubric
|
c.
Standards against which the quality and quantity of performances
are assessed (what counts or is important).
|
|
___
4. Assessment
|
d.
Structuring of situations in ways that help students change,
through learning.
|
|
___
5. Criteria
|
e.
Collecting information about the quality or quantity of a change
in a student, group, teacher, or administrator.
|
|
___
6. Evaluation
|
f.
Articulation of gradations of quality and quantity for each
criterion, from poor to exemplary.
|
(Johnson,
Johnson, & Holubec 1998)
Assessment
Issues
The
table below shows the advantages and the disadvantages of different types
of assessment.
Purpose
|
Focus
|
Setting
|
Stakeholders
|
Stakes
|
|
Diagnostic
|
Process
of learning
|
Artificial
(classroom)
|
Students-parents
|
Low
|
|
Formative
|
Process
of instruction
|
Authentic
(real-world)
|
Teachers,
administrators
|
High
|
|
Summative
|
Outcomes
of learning
|
|
Policy-makers
|
|
|
|
Outcomes
of instruction
|
|
Colleges,
employers
|
|
Meaningful
Assessment
Two
of the biggest problems educators have to cope with in conducting
efficient and responsible assessments are making the assessments
meaningful to stakeholders and manageable so they actually get done.
Meaningful
assessment is created by:
(Johnson,
Johnson, & Holubec 1998)
MEANINGFUL
ASSESSMENT
|
Positive
Interdependence
|
Involvement
|
Useful
results
|
|
Common
purpose
|
Setting
goals, planning paths to achieve goals, assessing progress,
planning for improvement, implementing plans
|
Clarity
of next steps to improve
|
|
Positive
relationships
|
Ownership
|
Use
of results
|
According
to Johnson, Johnson, & Holubec (p.8:6, 1998) “cooperative learning
groups provide the setting, context and environment in which assessment
becomes part of the instructional process and students learn almost as
much from assessing the quality of their own and their classmates’ work
as they do from participating in the instructional activities.”